Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Eng. sanit. ambient ; 26(5): 979-987, set.-out. 2021. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1346008

ABSTRACT

RESUMO A evapotranspiração de referência é uma componente muito importante do balanço hídrico e sua estimativa é essencial para execução de projetos agrícolas e ambientais, estudos de balanço hídrico, projetos e manejo de irrigação, modelagem de processos climatológicos e planejamento do gerenciamento dos recursos hídricos. O método de Penman-Monteith é considerado pela Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations como padrão para estimar a evapotranspiração de referência, contudo, dada a dificuldade de se obter um número grande de variáveis meteorológicas que são empregadas nesse método, tem-se utilizado vários outros métodos para estimar a evapotranspiração de referência. O presente trabalho teve como objetivo comparar, por meio de valores diários e mensais estimados pelo método de Penman-Monteith, o desempenho dos métodos de Thornthwaite, Hargraves-Samani, Makkink, Blaney-Criddle, Camargo e Jensen-Haise para o município de São José dos Ausentes, no Rio Grande do Sul. Os dados utilizados para estimar a evapotranspiração de referência foram obtidos pelo sistema Agritempo, que armazena e disponibiliza os dados da estação meteorológica automática do Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. Os resultados apontam que o método de Blaney-Criddle foi o que apresentou os melhores resultados nas escalas tanto diária quanto mensal, seguido pelo método de Jensen-Haise, na escala mensal. Já os métodos que apresentaram os piores desempenhos foram o de Thorntwaite e Camargo, sendo classificados com desempenho "sofrível" na escala mensal e como "péssimo" e "mau", respectivamente, na escala diária.


ABSTRACT Reference evapotranspiration is a very important component of the water balance and its estimation is essential for the execution of agricultural and environmental projects, for studies of water balance, irrigation projects and management, modeling of climatological processes and planning of water resources management. The Penman-Monteith method is considered by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations as a standard for estimating reference evapotranspiration; however, due to the difficulty of obtaining a large number of meteorological variables that are employed in this method, several other methods have been used to estimate the reference evapotranspiration. The present coursework had the objective to compare the performance of the Thornthwaite, Hargraves-Samani, Makkink, Blaney-Criddle, Camargo, and Jensen-Haise methods for the municipality of São José dos Ausentes, using daily and monthly values estimated by the Penman-Monteith method. The data used to estimate the reference evapotranspiration were obtained through the Agritempo system, which stores and makes available the data of the automatic meteorological station of the National Meteorological Institute. The results show that the Blaney-Criddle method presented the best results, both daily and monthly, followed by the Jensen-Haise method in the monthly scale. On the other hand, the methods that presented the worst performances were those of Thorntwaite and Camargo, classified as "poor" on the monthly scale, and as "terrible" and "bad", respectively, on the daily one.

2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-177900

ABSTRACT

The experiment was conducted on sunflower (variety BARI Surjomukhi-2) crop during the month of mid-November, 2014 to mid-March, 2015, in a lysimeter (dimension:1 m X 1 m X 1 m size) to measure crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and determine crop coefficient (kc) values at Irrigation and Water Management Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur. The study was examined by applying four irrigation at an interval of 10, 15, 20, and 25 days allowing drainage within and adjacent the tank. Results reveals that irrigation at 15 days interval produced the highest yield and was considered suitable for estimating ETc and kc. Seasonal total ETc was found as 270.89 mm. The kc values of sunflower under different ET0 methods for initial, development, mid-season and late season ranged from 0.34 to 0.48, 0.80 to 1.10, 1.06 to 1.55, and 0.27 to 0.36, respectively. Among different methods, P-M method gave relatively higher value than those of other methods and also FAO recommended value. Therefore, this information would be a helpful tool for crop water requirement and irrigation scheduling for similar semi-arid climates.

3.
Biosci. j. (Online) ; 27(1): 95-101, jan./fev. 2011. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-911747

ABSTRACT

Muitas são as metodologias de estimativas da evapotranspiração de referência e o seu conhecimento é base fundamental para dimensionar e manejar adequadamente a irrigação. Neste trabalho foram avaliados alguns métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência para as condições climáticas de Uberlândia. Os métodos avaliados foram os de Thornthwaite, Camargo, Hargreaves-Samani, Priestley-Taylor e do Tanque Classe A. As evapotranspirações diárias estimadas por esses métodos foram correlacionadas com as obtidas pelo método padrão (Penman-Monteith FAO-56) por meio de índices estatísticos. O método de Priestley-Taylor apresentou ótimo desempenho enquanto que Thornthwaite e Hargreaves-Samani apresentaram bom desempenho. O método de Camargo obteve desempenho apenas regular enquanto que o do Tanque Classe A apresentou péssimo desempenho. Os métodos de Thornthwaite e Hargreaves-Samani apresentam-se como uma alternativa para se estimar a evapotranspiração de referência quando se dispõe apenas dos dados de temperatura do ar.


Many are the methods to estimate the reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and your knowledge is essentially to plan and to manage irrigation correctly. This present work evaluated some ETo methods under climate conditions of Uberlandia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. The methods tested were: Thornthwaite, Camargo, Hargreaves- Samani, Priestley-Taylor and Class A Pan evaporation. The daily ETo estimated by these methods were correlated with by the standard method (Penman-Monteith FAO-56) through statistical indexes. The method of Priestley-Taylor showed good performance, while Hargreaves-Samani and Thornthwaite were considered as good performance. The Camargo method had regular performance whereas Class A pan showed poor performance. The methods of Thornthwaite and Hargreaves- Samani are alternatives to estimate ETo especially when only the temperature data are available


Subject(s)
Agricultural Irrigation , Climate Change , Evapotranspiration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL